How is Dugard's narrative style similar to Mary Rowlandson's (232-238, in our text)? Think less in terms of what they went through and more in terms of how they speak of their respective captors, their tone, and their rhetorical appeals to their readers. For example, are they appealing to our sense of sympathy (pathos), reasonability (logos), or to our sense of justice (ethos)? How do they do these things? How are we supposed to consider their captors after reading their accounts? Is there a call to action of some sort?
Finally, how are their narratives different? Think in terms of why their captors decided to hold them hostage.